BizWest’s Dallas Heltzell reports that the Greeley City Council voted 5 to 2 to deny Historic Greeley Inc.’s bid to declare the round City Hall at 1000 10th Street a historic building, clearing the way for demolition late next spring to make room for parking tied to the planned downtown civic campus. Council members Deb Deboutez and Tommy Butler dissented. The campus is intended to consolidate facilities for the city, Weld County, and Greeley-Evans School District 6.
According to the story, financing will use certificates of participation, with issuance likely in September. City officials said renovation of the 1968-era building would have cost 24 to 34 million dollars and still left major problems, including flooding and skylights, with little room to expand. Staff will vacate the building by the end of February so demolition can proceed.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Vote is 5–2. Historic designation denied. Deb Deboutez and Tommy Butler dissent. Demolition set for late spring to support the civic campus.
- Parking for progress. The site becomes parking for a joint city, county, and school district campus to bring more workers and spending downtown.
- Dollars and sense. Renovation was pegged at 24 to 34 million dollars with serious building issues and limited expansion potential.
- How to pay. Certificates of participation, structured to start with capitalized interest and interest-only before full debt service, within existing resources.
- Timeline moving. Staff out by end of February. Financing authorization targeted for September. Construction activity expected to boost downtown sales tax.
My Bottom Line
I appreciate this sound decision by the Greeley City Council. It is time to get on with the next chapter of downtown Greeley. This building was not historic. It was just old. Weld County held multiple public meetings on this vision. To Historic Greeley, Inc.: where were you then? The 11th-hour petition was a performative, grandstanding fire drill, and the audacity to seek a designation on property you do not own is something else.
To Councilors Deb Deboutez and Tommy Butler: you lobbied me to keep the county Justice Center downtown. Then I watched you invoke downtown’s betterment while fighting Cascadia and Catalyst. Now you voted to slap a historic label on a tired building and put the entire downtown partnership at risk. I do not understand those conflicting actions, and it makes me question the judgment behind them. You are independently elected. So be it. It does temper how I approach future work with you.
Downtown Greeley deserves momentum, not a museum piece with a leaky skylight. Let us build the civic campus, add parking, welcome more workers and customers, and keep the revival moving. Forward motion beats pretense every day of the week.
Source: BizWest


Good for you for saying it like it is. The building that was in the round buildings location had a lot more historical value than the round building. Tha Salvation Army occupied it before the Greeley Christian Church, right before it was demolished. Keep up the good work, Scott!
I respect that you care about the civic campus project in downtown Greeley and want to see it thrive — that’s a goal many of us share. Where I strongly disagree is with the framing that this historic nomination of the “round building” is somehow about nostalgia, obstruction, or “pretense.”
Historic designation is not the same thing as freezing progress. Communities across the country successfully balance preservation and development, and doing so often strengthens downtown momentum rather than stalling it. Calling a building “just old” dismisses the broader civic, cultural, and architectural value that many residents clearly see — enough to speak up, even late in the process.
As for timing: community engagement doesn’t stop when one set of meetings ends. When new information, new plans, or new risks emerge, people have every right to respond. That isn’t grandstanding — it’s civic participation. Ownership is not a prerequisite for advocacy, and suggesting otherwise sets a troubling precedent for public discourse.
Reasonable people can disagree on the best path forward. But questioning motives, judgments, or commitment because others value preservation alongside growth oversimplifies a complex issue. Downtown Greeley deserves both momentum and care — progress that’s thoughtful, inclusive, and rooted in the community’s full story, not just its next project.
Forward motion matters. So does how we move forward, and who gets heard along the way.